Home Privacy Epsilon Could Push Publicis Into A New Privacy Ballgame

Epsilon Could Push Publicis Into A New Privacy Ballgame

SHARE:

With its $4.4 billion acquisition of Epsilon/Conversant, Publicis Groupe becomes a data controller – and that ups the regulatory ante under the General Data Protection Regulation and, likely, any other privacy legislation that comes down the pike.

Controllers, in GDPR parlance, determine how and why personal data is processed. Controllers are also required to establish a legal basis for the processing of data, which usually means being responsible for collecting and managing consent, if consent is what’s called for.

It’s the controller’s job to make sure that its data processor partners are doing a proper job under the law.

Being classified as a controller is a new look for Publicis, which before arguably had some level of plausible deniability as a processor in that it didn’t actually own any client data.

Publicis is “not used to that position, and I don’t know how much bandwidth Epsilon’s privacy team has to manage how their data is going to be used across the whole ecosystem,” said Fatemeh Khatibloo, a VP and principal analyst at Forrester.

And the heat is only set to get hotter not just in Europe, but in the United States and countries all over the world.

“The pendulum of consumer data privacy continues to trend toward more regulation, more oversight and more complexity,” said Mykolas Rambus, general manager of Equifax’s data-driven marketing business. “Any organization working with consumer data must be focused on the evolving regulatory landscape, not just to manage risk, but to fulfill data ethics obligations on behalf of consumers.”

But the data assets that Publicis is bringing on board with its mega acquisition – including pseudonymized identifiers for consumer IDs that connect to first-party transactional data – could be viewed as the opposite of a liability.

Keeping data close to home means Publicis has more direct oversight of it, said Jason Bier, who spent more than seven years as chief privacy officer at Conversant before joining digital consultancy The Engine Group as EVP and chief data and privacy officer in 2016.

“Large companies that are responsible for large brands often come to find that there’s a risk and some level of exposure in working with third parties,” Bier said. “But if they become responsible for those assets, they can do what’s necessary to protect the brands that use them.”

Even so, Publicis and all the other holding companies that have been acquiring data businesses as of late – IPG with Acxiom and Dentsu with Merkle – would do well to be cautious, said Johnny Ryan, chief policy and industry officer at Brave.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

A smarter strategy might be for global agencies to “develop sophisticated ways to use clean, safe ‘non-personal’ data that is out of GDPR’s scope and exposes agencies and their clients to no shred of risk,” Ryan said. “Alternatively, they could start building relationships with prospective consumers to collect high-quality data of unimpeachable provenance – betting on the data collection business-as-usual is a bad bet.”

Conversant and Epsilon undergo rigorous annual independent audits conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers to ensure the right processes are in place so that personally identifiable information (PII), of the online or the offline variety, never makes its way into a user profile.

But PII is an American term of art. Under GDPR, there’s a broader concept of personal data, which includes any information that can be used to identify a person, like location data or mobile device IDs.

Ryan pointed to a page on Conversant’s website, which claims that its solution “starts with recognizing millions of real people across all their devices and browsers, and assigning each of them a unique, privacy-protected Core ID.”

“One would have to be very confident about the provenance of these data to feel any degree of comfort about this acquisition,” Ryan said.

But Publicis’ Epsilon acquisition doesn’t immediately open itself up to a higher degree of GDPR-related scrutiny, said Wolfie Christl, a data privacy expert and founder of Cracked Labs, a nonprofit think tank based in Vienna. Publicis isn’t a total noob. It already owns “highly exposed data businesses,” such as Sapient and RUN, Christl said.

“It depends on how they integrate Epsilon’s US business and how they will expand it to Europe, if they expand it to Europe,” he said. “But the Epsilon acquisition may draw attention to the public debate – it’s known as a data broker, it manages loads of personal information and it once provided data to Facebook.”

Conversant declined to comment for this story.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.