Home Privacy Google Loses Its Appeal On 50 Million Euro GDPR Fine

Google Loses Its Appeal On 50 Million Euro GDPR Fine

SHARE:

Remember that 50 million euro fine that Google got slapped with in France for failing to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation last year?

Looks like Google is going to have to pay up.

On Friday, the Conseil d’État (translates to Council of State), a division of the French government that serves as the supreme court of administrative justice, sided with France’s data protection authority, the CNIL (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés), which levied the fine against Google in January 2019.

(Fun fact: Napoleon Bonaparte founded the Conseil d’État in 1799.)

The CNIL’s sanctions focused mainly on two specific GDPR infringements: having a non-transparent consent gathering process that doesn’t give users enough info to make an informed decision and – the bigger issue – the lack of a legal basis for processing personal data for advertising purposes.

At the time, Google’s fine (which translates to just over $56 million) was the largest issued under GDPR. Today, that dubious honor goes to British Airways in the United Kingdom, which was fined more than 204 million euros (roughly $229 million) in July 2019 for a massive 2018 data breach.

Google immediately announced its intention to appeal the CNIL’s decision. In a January statement, Google defended its consent process for serving personalized ads and said it was “concerned about the impact of this ruling on publishers, original content creators and tech companies in Europe and beyond.”

Google appealed on the grounds that the French DPA doesn’t have jurisdiction over Google’s European headquarters. Google claimed that the Irish data protection authority should be leading any cases or investigations into its practices.

But the argument apparently didn’t fly, and the Conseil d’État is expected to issue its final judgement next week.

The CNIL’s original ruling in January followed a series of complaints filed by two nonprofit groups, La Quadrature du Net and None Of Your Business, both of which accused Google of lacking a legal basis for processing the personal data of its users.

None Of Your Business is led by Max Schrems, the Austrian lawyer and privacy campaigner responsible for bringing the 2013 legal challenge against Facebook’s international data-sharing practices that ultimately overturned the Safe Harbor agreement.

Must Read

US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria

The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case Is Over – And Here’s What’s Happening Next

Just three weeks after it began, the Google ad tech antitrust trial in Virginia is over. The court will now take a nearly two-month break before reconvening for closing arguments right before Thanksgiving.

Jounce Media's Chris Kane at Programmatic IO NY on Sept. 25, 2024.

The Bidstream Is A Duplicative, Chaotic Mess – But It Doesn’t Have To Be That Way

Publishers are initiating more and more auctions – but doesn’t mean DSPs are listening to more bids, according to Chris Kane.

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Spicy Quotes You’ll Be Quoting From The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

A lot has already been said and cited during the Google ad tech antitrust trial, with more to come. Here are a few of the most notable quotables from the first two weeks.

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.