Home Privacy Prog IO: What Will Be The Fate Of Third-Party Data After GDPR?

Prog IO: What Will Be The Fate Of Third-Party Data After GDPR?

SHARE:

Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will kill the third-party data ecosystem. Or third-party data isn’t going anywhere.

The truth sits somewhere in the middle, said Alice Lincoln, MediaMath’s VP of data policy and governance, at AdExchanger’s Programmatic I/O in San Francisco on Wednesday.

“Third-party data is here to stay – if it’s high-quality,” said Lincoln, who’s both a man and a woman – if you go by the data floating around about her in the third-party ecosystem. She’s been targeted as both.

Patrick Salyer, CEO of SAP-owned Gigya, is slim and around six feet tall, but when he looked up what data the brokers have on him, “weight-loss products” was listed as an interest.

“I question the validity of third-party data moving forward,” Salyer said. “The brands we’re working with, including large CPGs, are realizing that a direct digital connection with consumers is extremely important – in fact, it’s a differentiator.”

Third-party data has been having a hard time lately.

Post-Cambridge Analytica, Facebook decided to kill third-party partner targeting through its platform to the great consternation of data brokers, like Acxiom. And with GDPR coming down the pike, advertisers are increasingly looking inward to foster their first-party relationships.

But that doesn’t mean third-party data is circling the drain in a GDPR world.

Some brands will always need to supplement with third-party data, and the data will just have to get cleaner out of necessity. Not every brand has enough first-party data to power a digital advertising strategy, said Fatima Khan, chief privacy officer at Demandbase

“I don’t want to go to a website and for it to think that I’m a man in his 40s,” she said. “Third-party data … is an important thing, but it will need to be fixed going forward.”

GDPR will help by encouraging data controllers to shore up their supply chain partners, as it lists clauses that have to be included in data protection agreements, including a requirement for processors to help their controllers fulfill data subject requests and cooperate in the case of a breach.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But third-party vendors shouldn’t just sign whatever lands on their desk, said Emily Jones, a data privacy and technology partner at law firm Osborne Clarke LLP, where she leads the Silicon Valley office.

GDPR codifies what should be in these agreements, but that “doesn’t mean every agreement looks the same,” she said. “Be careful about what you’re asked to sign, and don’t just assume it’s covering the bare minimum. We’ve seen a lot of companies try to include additional obligations.”

But the risk cuts both ways.

In doing its due diligence on partners, MediaMath has seen some try to claim in their written responses that they’re 100% GDPR compliant already – and there’s just no way that’s true.

“I have to call BS on that,” Lincoln said. “I don’t think anyone can say that with certainty at this point. The spirit of GDPR is clear, but what that means practically is unclear. May 25 is just the beginning of how regulation will be implemented and applied, especially across an ecosystem as complex as ours is.”

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.