Home Publishers Google Goes After Individual Pages That Violate Brand Safety, Not Entire Sites

Google Goes After Individual Pages That Violate Brand Safety, Not Entire Sites

SHARE:

Google wants to clean up where it places ads, but it also doesn’t want to hurt its publishers’ revenue.

So instead of kicking out an entire site that violates a Google policy, Google will remove individual pages from a publisher’s site that violate Google policies.

AdSense publishers will receive emails when content violates Google policies, and can log into a “policy center” interface that shows them why they received a violation and how to bring ads back to that page. Publishers using AdX will receive emails and communicate with account representatives about the changes.

“We want to be as surgical and narrow as possible when we take policy action against violations,” said Scott Spencer, director of product management for sustainable ads at Google.

Google said it has been working for months to make policy violations more transparent to publishers.

But Google accelerated the ability to take page-level action in the wake of advertisers pulling spend from YouTube and the Google Display Network over concerns about brand safety.

Page-level controls allow Google to remove bad content more quickly, Spencer said.

When Google removed entire sites for policy violations, it would wait until the site had racked up several violations before taking action. Flagging individual pages has less of a downside for publishers than banning their entire site, so Google can pause ads as violations crop up.

For example, Google’s content policies prohibit content promoting binge drinking, tobacco, illicit drugs, gambling, gore, hacking and fake diplomas. Google will use a mixture of algorithmic screening and manual review to flag pages.

Similar controls already exist on YouTube. Last September, YouTube started notifying creators about which of their videos were ineligible for monetization. As YouTube increased its transparency about how it classified content, creators learned about the imperfections in Google’s screening algorithms.

Publishers monetizing through AdSense will have a better sense about which of their pages are completely blocked, but they won’t receive notifications about content that may be brand-safe for some advertisers but not others.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“This is about understanding how your content is being reviewed by our systems, not trying to forecast how much buyer demand may exist based on how it’s been classified,” Spencer said.

Google said it hadn’t quantified how many pages would be removed under this policy change (though it has quantified the impact of bad ads before). But the market this change addresses is large: More than 2 million AdSense publishers made $11 billion from ads supplied by Google last year.

“We want to enable an open web,” Spencer said. “These policies are critical to ensuring the open web can survive and thrive and ensure that publishers can continue to make money from our ads platform.”

Must Read

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.