Home The Big Story Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

SHARE:
AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

It’s never a slow week in the land of ad tech, including in the courthouse.

Earlier this week, federal judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that Google will not have to break up its advertising business. That’s after she ruled in April that the company operates a monopoly in the supply-side platform and ad server markets. 

Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleging that it made advertisers pay more than was necessary for Sponsored Product ads on its flagship ecommerce site.

As for Google, this isn’t its first rodeo with avoiding structural remedies. Google was found guilty of running an online search monopoly two years ago, but was allowed to keep ownership of its Chrome browser, despite the Department of Justice requesting that Google be forced to sell it.

“This is the second time that the federal government has found Google guilty of operating a monopoly but declined to take meaningful action to break up that monopoly,” said Anthony Vargas, AdExchanger’s managing editor, on this week’s episode of The Big Story. 

Still, the fallout from Google’s ad tech antitrust trial isn’t completely over just yet. Google will have to implement behavioral remedies meant to address the anticompetitive nature of its ad business. But those remedies are still to be determined.

On the other side of the courthouse, Amazon is fighting a legal battle of its own.

It now faces a lawsuit from the FTC and 22 state attorneys general accusing Amazon of operating a fake bidder – or, in Amazon’s preferred terms, a “soft reserve price” – that placed bids much closer to the winning bidder’s price. Which means advertisers were paying nearly their full bid instead of one cent more than the second-highest bid, as typical second-price auction rules dictate.

That alleged auction manipulation made advertisers pay tens of billions of dollars more than they should have for Sponsored Product placements on Amazon, the FTC claims. By the FTC’s count, this tactic netted Amazon about $20 billion in revenue since 2019.

Although it’s still unclear what the consequences for Google and Amazon will be, it’s clear that the federal government and the ad tech industry both expect Big Tech companies to act with transparency and fairness.

But will they? Or won’t they?

Also in this episode: We discuss OpenAI’s annualized revenue announcement and what media buyers need to see from OpenAI before they invest more ad dollars into ChatGPT. We also dig into The Trade Desk’s Kokai Zuma update as a pulse check on programmatic platforms’ investment in agentic AI.

Must Read

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.

How The Fin Tech Clearco Finances Ecommerce Startups (Without Losing Its Shirt)

This week, the Commerce Media Newsletter catches up with a startup from outside the world of data-driven advertising, but with an interesting position when it comes to ecommerce advertising. That’s Clearco, a Canadian fin tech company founded in 2015.

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 26: Halo Collar CMO Seth Solomons attends a Celebration to Shine a Light On Dog Safety With Halo Collar on April 26, 2022 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Stefanie Keenan/Getty Images for Halo Collar)

How Halo Collar Uses Data And Incrementality To Raise Both Awareness And Sales

Halo Collar, a dog collar brand with direct-to-consumer origins, is preparing for its retail expansion by honing its first-party data strategy and incrementality measurement.