Home The Sell Sider Apple’s Lower Commission Won’t Offset the Larger Damage It’s Doing to Publishers via IDFA Changes

Apple’s Lower Commission Won’t Offset the Larger Damage It’s Doing to Publishers via IDFA Changes

SHARE:
Ionut Ciobotaru

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Ionut Ciobotaru, Chief Product Officer at Verve Group.

With the loss of IDFA and the resulting limitations on audience targeting, all signs point to a significant hit for app ad revenues.

Developers can expect to see a drop of an estimated 50% in ad revenues, if not more, due to the transition, according to Facebook testing. Although Apple likes to point out that ad revenues continued to grow even after it introduced its Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP), that’s really only half the story. Most of that growth occurred within walled gardens, and at a time when the digital advertising market was substantially smaller. 

A publisher reprieve via reduced Apple commissions?

Last November, Apple introduced a program that reduces App Store commissions from 30% to 15% for small businesses, which is being touted as a win for independent app creators. For a small business, that’s a $150,000 bonus.

But don’t break out the champagne just yet. In the context of Apple’s other policy shift – the removal of the IDFA – the picture is more grim. That change will more than offset any commission reduction benefits in the coming year. 

For the industry as a whole, cutting commissions is just a distraction from the larger harm Apple is levying on developers and publishers. However, smaller developers can benefit from the lower commission by strategically diversifying their business models for monetization. 

Apple’s ulterior motive

While a possible addition of up to $150,000 to the bottom line can be a big deal for an independent app publisher, for Apple that revenue is insignificant. It’s estimated that about 98% of iOS apps generate less than $1 million in annual revenue, but these apps represent only about 5% to 8% of Apple’s app store revenues. In other words, the 2% of companies that will continue to pay the original 30% commission account for about 95% of the app store’s revenues. 

Regardless, even if you concede Apple’s new program as a “backing down” due to industry complaints, there’s another initiative that the company is decidedly not backing down from, and that’s its crippling of IDFA. This move alone poses far more financial danger to the app publishing industry than a continuation of high commission structures ever could.  

An opportunity lies within a hybrid monetization strategy

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Ultimately, Apple is pushing the app landscape toward a hybrid monetization model. Combining in-app advertising, in-app purchases, and subscriptions will prove the most sustainable model going forward. 

The lower commission fees will provide some relief to smaller developers who see their ad revenues decline. For some apps, the reduction might even prove to be a necessary lifeline. Ideally, developers with free, ad-supported apps will be able to find the sweet spot wherein in-app ad revenues are supplemented by in-app purchases that remain below the $1 million mark. 

Change will continue to be the only constant when it comes to giants like Apple. As developers try to strike a financial balance amid Apple’s shifting commission and advertising policies, they must continue to strive for efficiencies wherever they find them. Ultimately, continued success in the increasingly complex app space will require diligence, nimbleness – and the realization that there is no such thing as “free money” when it comes to a tech titan.  

Must Read

What Publishers Need To Know About Floor Pricing

At Tuesday’s Prebid Summit, a panel of publisher and pub tech execs shared tips for how publishers can get the most out their flooring strategies.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Why Mondelez Piloted A Shopper Marketing Test Between Albertsons And Fetch

“I always said, I think we need to change our title, because it’s not the old school shopper marketing,” said Anne Martin, director of shopper marketing for Mondelez International, which owns Oreo, Ritz, and a variety of other snacks.

Forget The FUD, Now DoubleVerify Wants Advertisers To Get Back Into The News

Even brand safety companies think news blocking has gone too far. DV is exploring ways to help advertisers support legitimate news and just hired its first-ever head of news.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

To Reduce The Ad Tech Tax, Sovrn Expands Its SaaS Pricing Model

Sovrn is now offering its header bidding managed service, dubbed Ad Management, as self-serve software for a flat CPM fee.

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.