Home The Sell Sider Publishers, It’s Time To Share The Risk Of Online Video

Publishers, It’s Time To Share The Risk Of Online Video

SHARE:

ashleyswartzThe Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Ashley Swartz, co-founder and CEO of Furious Corp.

Despite being the fastest-growing advertising medium, digital video remains a seriously difficult business for premium publishers.

The costs of producing premium content remain high, it’s a constant battle to grow and maintain audience and subscribers across channels, and the value chain gets more complicated each day. The situation will only get worse: In 2018, for the first time ever, video consumption is projected to flatten, putting even greater pressure on margins.

The result? Even with the high CPMs that premium video inventory commands, many leading publishers are struggling to make digital video a profitable, standalone business unit.

One of the primary drivers behind the struggle for profitability is that the number of hands in the digital video pot keeps growing, taking off the top and from the bottom. As technology improves, the operational costs of video have actually become more expensive, not less.

Publishers must now be present on a growing number of platforms to deliver meaningful reach, which means additional ad server costs and investments in systems that enable the creation and maintenance of private marketplaces and connections to any number of supply-side platforms (SSPs) and exchanges. Publishers foot the bill for anti-fraud and viewability verification measures, as well as for third-party data licenses that are table stakes for delivering the targeting that most marketers require.

While the consolidation of the ad tech industry might seem a welcome acknowledgment that the digital video value chain is overpopulated, for publishers, it’s actually another cause for concern. As sector leaders buy up smaller players, publishers will face even greater margin pressure because they will have fewer options and less room to negotiate prices.

So the question is, what comes next? How do we evolve to enable publishers to build sustainable video businesses?

In short, we need to start sharing risk across the video value chain. We need a new business model that is based on economic value delivered, not just a percentage of whatever flows through the platform.

Publishers should start now, while they still have leverage, to reexamine their relationships with vendors. And vendors – including data providers, SSPs and demand-side platforms, to name a few – need to begin to see the bigger picture. If publishers fail, we all fail. Publishers are getting squeezed to a point where they will start doing everything possible to avoid reliance on ad tech vendors to fulfill revenue goals.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Vendors must act as partners, raising their hands to reevaluate their business models and being receptive to new ones. Publishers must also take a leadership role by being open to incentivizing partners to deliver economic value and compensating vendors accordingly. A new value-based model would align goals along the entire video value chain and create more upside for each vendor involved. This can be done by setting expectations and targets based on measurable business outcomes, which include net revenue metrics for publishers and not only volume of transactions, as is the dominant ad tech business model today.

The traditional ad tech business model of “percentage that flows through the pipes” was designed in a display and search world where supply was unconstrained. There was always more volume available, and tonnage was the norm. That is simply not the case for premium video; despite exponential growth, it is still in short supply. So even if vendors don’t reevaluate their models for the right reason, such as potential partnerships, they will have to do so to ensure long-term viability, and waiting will only make the problem worse.

The entire video value chain is facing hard times. We are commencing an era where not only transparency but also collaboration and partnership, driven by shared goals and measurable outcomes, are required to set a new course for the industry. The only way to thrive is to share both the risks and the rewards of online video – and take ownership of turning the ship around.

Follow Furious Corp. (@FuriousCorp) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.