Home TV OpenAP Plans Its Digital Ad Buying Platform, Without WarnerMedia

OpenAP Plans Its Digital Ad Buying Platform, Without WarnerMedia

SHARE:

Keep calm and … develop automated systems for advanced TV ad buying?

A question mark loomed over OpenAP when founding member WarnerMedia announced its sudden departure last week from the targeted TV advertising consortium it helped create in 2017.

But the group’s remaining members – NBCU, Viacom and Fox – are forging ahead with the planned launch of OpenAP 2.0, a digital ad-buying marketplace powered by Accenture and Comcast’s ad server division, FreeWheel.

OpenAP 2.0 is still in development, but when it’s fully baked, advertisers should be able to actually buy audience segments across national linear TV and long-form digital video. The beta will open up sometime in June, and the whole shebang should be ready to run campaigns in time for the fall TV season.

Buyers will be able to either log in to the OpenAP system directly or access it through an API via integrations with agency planning systems or approved demand-side platforms with scaled linear TV-buying capabilities.

It’s too early to share the names of specific DSPs, but the goal, said Krishan Bhatia, EVP of business operations and strategy for NBCU’s ad sales division, is interoperability.

“Standardization and uniformity are critical for industry adoption,” he said. “This is taking the workflow of advanced advertising a few steps further by automating order management and plan development right up to the point of transaction.”

But that’s where automation hits a wall, at least for now, because linear TV still has its limits.

Legacy linear TV systems don’t allow for digital ad insertion, which means that although advertisers will be able to buy their ads and set up their targeting through the OpenAP platform, each broadcaster will handle the actual trafficking on its own.

And there’s another limitation – no inventory from programmers that aren’t also OpenAP members and no inventory from WarnerMedia, of course.

Regardless of losing WarnerMedia, the original vision – to help broadcasters get on the same page around standards – remains intact, Bhatia said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“We’ve seen many standards set by the industry that lack translation to an actual platform or product development,” Bhatia said. “We’re not just agreeing on standards, we’re also architecting platforms that can execute on those standards in partnership with others.”

Bhatia said he’s optimistic that the initiative’s success will persuade other broadcasters to hop on board with OpenAP, and there are only so many out there.

“The TV industry is relatively concentrated, and there’s less than a handful of programmers that could potentially be members,” he said. “We’re in constant contact with everyone, and we’re hopeful that by launching a digital marketplace, more programmers will see the benefits.”

But what about some form of potential collaboration with WarnerMedia, despite its departure?

“You would have to ask WarnerMedia that,” Bhatia said. “When they were a part of this, they were supportive and invested in the road map. But either way, we all ultimately share the same objectives.”

Must Read

People Inc.'s Patrick McCarthy (right) chats with Mula's Jason White at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.