Home On TV & Video An Interoperable Future For Linear And Connected TV

An Interoperable Future For Linear And Connected TV

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is by Anthony Katsur, CEO of the IAB Tech Lab

Linear TV remains a powerhouse business, and for good reason. With scaled infrastructure, exclusive live sports rights and the unparalleled ability to attract massive audiences for culturally vital events, linear TV will continue to dominate ad inventory for years to come. 

But the giants of linear TV are fully aware of the power of streaming. They have access to the same data we all do: US ad spending on linear and Connected TV (CTV) platforms will exceed $99 billion by 2025, from just under $88 billion this year.

Television executives also fully grasp that CTV will drive the entirety of that anticipated $11 billion of growth. In fact, CTV claimed more than one-third of total TV time in June 2022, thanks to four straight months of record-breaking growth. Consumers love the convenience of streaming, and there are more ad-supported ways to do it than ever.

Yet it’s difficult for linear budgets to shift to streaming the way things currently stand. It’s not nearly easy enough to buy or measure audiences or reconcile your buy. There’s too much manual work and not enough normalized signaling. Buyers have to synthesize a patchwork of disparate data sources to generate a clear picture and struggle to report holistic results back up to the C-suite.

Both linear TV executives and CTV executives have every reason to want a future with more interoperability and addressability. There are many shared use cases across linear and connected television. And there is value in the creation and stewardship of technical standards and best practices to normalize data and create interoperability across all television environments.

The industry has a simple goal to pursue: to establish interoperability between legacy linear and connected television, which will streamline ad spend across both channels.

Getting to interoperability 

From the consumer’s point of view, TV is just TV. But from a technology point of view, each existing TV distribution environment uses different content delivery and ad signaling technologies.

That means each platform operates as its own silo, with separate workflows, measurement and reporting. It’s clumsy, but it doesn’t have to be.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

When properly marked and signaled, most television ads can be made ”addressable.” The industry must solve the following critical use cases across linear and CTV, with consumer privacy always in mind.

  1. Universal Reconciliation: Create the structure for streamlined and normalized reconciliation of TV buys across CTV, linear and broadcast environments.
  2. Cross-Environment Auditability: Develop open-source measurability for tracking ad creative across all platforms.
  3. Data Interoperability: Establish a common technical framework for audience interoperability, universal addressability and cross-environment frequency capping.
  4. Improved Ad Validation: Further develop Advanced TV anti-fraud measures and more accurately account for viewability.
  5. Frame Accurate Ad Replacement: Standardize the foundation for an impression-based TV market and universal ad break management.

Trying to force a common television distribution technology would be impossible. But the good news is it’s also unnecessary. Rather, what’s needed is a way to enable common signaling that allows all ads across all television environments to be identified by a specific asset ID and made addressable wherever possible. 

Whether an ad is on a traditional linear platform like cable, satellite, broadcast or emerging IP-enabled TV (CTV, OTT, Addressable Linear, streamed FAST channels), the industry must ensure that any ad can be identified and potentially offered as part of the addressable landscape.

The benefits are obvious: all TV ad exposures and addressable insertions can be tracked, reported and reconciled in a standardized and normalized format.

Addressability should be a business decision, not a technology constraint. 

Follow (@IABTechLab) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

For more articles featuring Anthony Katsur, click here.

Must Read

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.

Billups Launches Attention Measurement For Out-Of-Home

Billups, a managed services agency that specializes in OOH, is making its attention measurement solution and a related analytics dashboard available for general use.

US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria

The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case Is Over – And Here’s What’s Happening Next

Just three weeks after it began, the Google ad tech antitrust trial in Virginia is over. The court will now take a nearly two-month break before reconvening for closing arguments right before Thanksgiving.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Jounce Media's Chris Kane at Programmatic IO NY on Sept. 25, 2024.

The Bidstream Is A Duplicative, Chaotic Mess – But It Doesn’t Have To Be That Way

Publishers are initiating more and more auctions – but doesn’t mean DSPs are listening to more bids, according to Chris Kane.

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Spicy Quotes You’ll Be Quoting From The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

A lot has already been said and cited during the Google ad tech antitrust trial, with more to come. Here are a few of the most notable quotables from the first two weeks.