Home On TV & Video The Path Toward Standardization In OTT Advertising

The Path Toward Standardization In OTT Advertising

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Jim Wilson, president at Premion, a division of Tegna Inc.

It has been a pivotal year for over-the-top (OTT) advertising. Advertisers are following the eyeballs, and significant ad dollars are shifting from cable to OTT.

In the past year, we’ve seen new advancements in OTT targeting capabilities. OTT now combines the best of TV with the ability to precisely target viewers down to the ZIP-code level, based on demographics, lifestyle and interests.

New advanced analytics tools are also helping brands and agencies buy the audience and inventory they really want and better quantify OTT campaign results. For example, Nielsen and comScore are making more headway in providing reach, frequency and GRP measurement for OTT at the campaign level.

But despite great progress, our industry will need to drive toward standardization for OTT advertising to truly scale: We need to agree on and create unified measurement standards.

Without the ability to leverage historical data, which is available in digital media or standardized metrics, some advertisers and marketers hesitate to allocate greater OTT advertising spend.

Unlike digital advertising, connected TVs do not have cookies. This means that OTT targeting must be done via tags to IP addresses. In a cookieless environment, the data is there to be collected.

However, connected devices gather different types of data, which require more in-depth analysis and extensive matching using third-party data to complete viewer profiles. New capabilities are emerging to target users through a device ID that allows advertisers to leverage their first-party data or a data management platform to reach its identified audiences.

Since OTT does not have its own specific guidelines and protocols, agencies often try to apply to OTT the digital measurement standards for third-party tracking, viewability, invalid traffic and other KPIs. However, digital measurement solutions weren’t designed to incorporate OTT viewing.

Our OTT ecosystem of content providers, publishers and ad tech companies must work together to address agencies’ and clients’ concerns about measurement and transparency in three key areas: third-party tracking, viewability and VAST vs. VPAID, the IAB specifications for serving video ads.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

All of this requires the adoption of a standardized token of measurement. Measurement companies, such as Nielsen, comScore, MOAT and IAS, must also continue encouraging publishers and advertisers to solve for the fragmentation within OTT and agree on industry standards.

The governing bodies of the IAB and MRC must also support and drive the industry toward standardization. Specifically, they should set and govern impact metrics, such as viewability, fraud monitoring and completion rates.

Marketers and agencies will need to set clear expectations on OTT spend and identify which solutions offer the biggest ROI on the impact metrics that matter. Having alignment on the KPIs and metrics for measuring success is key for instilling greater advertiser confidence in OTT media spend.

Another industry development that has the potential to drive standardization is blockchain.  Blockchain offers tremendous potential to reduce fraud and costs in the advertising supply chain. By leveraging a decentralized network, advertisers can better align ad campaign KPIs, such as delivery, billing and viewability. Specifically, AdLedger, the blockchain consortium, is working to educate and help bring increased transparency and data security to the ad tech supply chain.

The future of television will be over the internet, and advertisers are already seizing the opportunities with the shifting consumer viewing habits. Together, all players can pave the way forward with greater collaboration with partners and greater investment in new capabilities to improve the standardization and delivery of advanced targeting and engagement for advertisers.

Follow Premion (@PremionMedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

CleanTap Says It Easily Fooled Programmatic Tech With Spoofed CTV Devices

CleanTap claims that 100% of the invalid traffic it spoofed was accepted into live auctions run by programmatic platforms and was successfully bid on by advertisers.

HUMAN Expands Its IVT Detection Tool Kit With A New Product For Advertisers, Not Platforms

HUMAN has recently started complementing its bid request analysis by analyzing the time between when a bot clicks an ad and when the landing page loads. Now it’s offering the solution to individual advertisers.

Index Exchange Launches A Data Marketplace For Sell-Side Curation

Through Index Exchange’s data vendor marketplace, curators gain access to third-party data sets without needing their own integrations.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Can Publishers Trust The Trade Desk’s New Wrapper?

TTD says OpenAds is not just a reaction to Prebid’s TID change, but a new model for fairer, more transparent ad auctions. So what does the DSP need to do to get publishers to adopt its new auction wrapper?

Scott Spencer’s New Startup Wants To Help Users Monetize Their Online Advertising Data

What happens when an ad tech developer partners with a cybersecurity expert to start a new company? You end up with a consumer product that is both a privacy software service and a programmatic advertising ID.

Former FTC commissioner Alvaro Bedoya speaks to AdExchanger Managing Editor Allison Schiff at Programmatic IO NY 2025.

Advertisers Probably Shouldn’t Target Teens At All, Cautions Former FTC Commissioner

Alvaro Bedoya shared his qualms with digital advertising’s more controversial targeting tactics and how kids use gen AI and social media.