Home On TV & Video The Death Of Linear TV Is Being Greatly Exaggerated

The Death Of Linear TV Is Being Greatly Exaggerated

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is written by Michele Madaris, media director at Boathouse

TV is not dead, nor is it dying. It is in an evolutionary state. Gone are the days of the family gathering in the living room, huddled around the one TV in the household, to watch NBC’s primetime lineup. What we have now is a fragmented viewing experience across multiple devices (TV, desktop, mobile, tablet) and services (linear TV, OTT, CTV) – and they’re all fighting for the viewer’s attention.

The pandemic was a watershed moment. Stay-at-home orders changed media consumption behaviors across all channels. Nielsen reported that video viewership increased by 60% thanks to CTV. And 44% of households have cut the cord or have never had traditional cable or satellite services.  

Choice in programming has grown, too. There are more than 817,000 unique program titles across US linear TV and streaming services, up from 646,000 in December 2019. 

For this reason, there is no one-size-fits-all solution for advertisers to reach their target audience. Rather, it comes down to who your target viewers are, what content they crave and how they consume it. But between distrust in Nielsen’s approach to TV metrics and continued fragmentation in digital measurement on the CTV side, advertisers don’t have clear answers.

An audience-first approach to measurement

Despite the shifts and acceleration toward streaming platforms, linear television remains the best way to reach a mass audience. Late last year, Nielsen reported that 32% of total TV time was spent with TV connected devices, compared to 68% with traditional TV. While there has been an overall ratings decline in traditional TV viewing, consumers continue to gravitate toward it for news and sports programming. Streaming, meanwhile, is the go-to for original and episodic content. Clearly, there’s a hunger for both. 

For CTV and linear to co-exist, there needs to be an evolution in measurement.  

We are in the age of focusing on the audience first for developing marketing strategies. We’re figuring out how they are behaving, the desired outcome, then determining the right time, right place and right message for intercepting our audiences. 

Shouldn’t we apply the same audience-first approach to measuring impact across linear and CTV?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Advertisers deserve a consistent measurement approach across platforms with one, equivalized currency for both. As these worlds coexist and move into the future, we need to lean into one currency that is consistent across both platforms so we can effectively measure and optimize for the consumer advertisers. 

We want and expect granularity, immediacy, transparency and flexibility in the current climate. For linear and CTV to remain relevant and coexist, measurement needs to evolve, just like the TV product.  

So is TV’s death exaggerated? Yes. Can TV and CTV coexist? Most definitely. My hope is that an audience-first measurement approach and common currency will be the solution for reinforcing that the two can, in fact, live happily ever after.

Follow Boathouse (@boathouseinc) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Biggest CPGs Face New Pressures To Increase Ads While Somehow Spending Less

In the past couple of weeks, many of the world’s biggest CPG and grocery store brands have reported their latest earnings. One thing is clear: CPG brands are under pressure by retailers to squeeze their margins, lower prices and spend more on ads.

DoubleVerify Breaks The Moat And Storms The Social Castle

What do Pepsi, Ulta Beauty and AB InBev have in common? A year ago, they were Moat clients. Now they’re in DoubleVerify’s camp.

Cookie caption contest (we've got until 2024, folks)

Vendors Like RTB House And Raptive Bought Into The Privacy Sandbox. Do They Feel Burned?

For some, Chrome’s news that it’s keeping third-party cookies was a moment of vindication. But was it a cruel blow to partners that tested the Privacy Sandbox in good faith?

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Surveillance Advertising

The FTC Orders Companies To Disclose Info On “Surveillance Pricing”

The FTC is ordering data from eight companies, which Commissioner Lina Khan describes as part of a “shadowy ecosystem of pricing middlemen,” in pursuit of visibility into “surveillance pricing.”

Privacy Theater

Alphabet Earnings Earn A Shrug From Investors, But Nobody Else Can Keep Up

Alphabet is so big that, even when it’s growing slowly – YouTube, for example, disappointed with a lower-than-expected growth rate – it’s still outpacing competitors.

Comic: What's your pick?

Google Says It Won't Deprecate Cookies In Chrome After All (?!)

You read that headline right: Google is seriously considering scrapping its plans to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome. Instead, it’s proposing some kind of TBD opt-out tool for third-party cookies.