Home Yield Management Tools Yieldex Q&A With Tom Shields: Optimizing For Publishers with Direct Sales Teams

Yieldex Q&A With Tom Shields: Optimizing For Publishers with Direct Sales Teams

SHARE:

Yieldex Yield Optimization ProfileTom Shields is Chief Executive Officer of yield optimization company, Yieldex.

AdExchanger.com: How many participating publishers?

TS: We have announced Martha Stewart Omnimedia as our first publisher partner. We are currently engaged with a number of other large publishers that we are not publicizing yet.

What is your target publisher market? Can any publisher participate?

Our target market is publishers who have a direct sales force and who want to maximize their revenue on premium inventory. While any publisher could participate, we are ideally suited for larger publishers who have their own sales team.

Do you consider your company’s model full-service or self-service?

We provide tools and technology solutions for publishers to gain a deeper understanding of their premium inventory, and provide recommendations to help them optimize their yield. These tools are used by each publisher’s in-house sales and operations teams. We manage the integration of the Yieldex solution, and provide services to our publishers to ensure they are taking full advantage of our tools to maximize their revenue.

What are the advantages of a yield optimization company?

The manual spreadsheets that most operations teams are using now are insufficient to give sales the answers they need to sell efficiently. Using a next generation tool like Yieldex BusinessIQ will help everyone in the organization make better decisions, drive operational efficiency, and optimize revenue.

What are the advantages of your company’s offerings among all the yield optimization companies?

We are the only one focused on the premium inventory that is sold by a direct sales force. For most large publishers, over 70% of their revenue comes from less than 10% of their inventory, and the average CPMs of inventory they sell are $10-20 vs $1 or less for ad networks. We enable publishers to manage, predict and optimize this premium inventory. (See slide 6 of the IAB/Bain study.)

Explain your company’s revenue model.

We are software-as-a-service with a monthly flat fee based on volume.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Can advertisers or ad networks buy through your company?

No. We do not sell inventory on behalf of our clients.

If not, will either of these two be able to purchase through your company someday?

We have no plans to sell inventory at this time.

What kinds of inventory are you “optimizing”? Static display, text? Rich media? Video?

We optimize premium inventory, which is typically sold directly by publishers on a CPM or CPD basis, at a high CPM. We support any and all creative formats deployed online today.

How do you see advertising exchanges impacting your business now and in the future?

Advertising exchanges are great for our industry, because they give publishers the ability to understand the baseline value of their inventory in an open market. Larger publishers will continue to sell premium inventory directly, because many ad campaigns will require characteristics that advertising exchanges have difficulty providing (impression guarantees, exclusivity, online/offline packages, etc), but this data will allow BusinessIQ to help them to make better decisions about packaging and selling their premium inventory.

Can your yield optimization service be integrated with other ad management platforms?

Yes, we are currently integrated with several ad serving platforms and several order management systems, and are integrating with more of these based on client demand.

Where do you see your company’s product line evolving in the next 18-24 months?

We will continue to provide solutions based on our DynamicIQ platform to help maximize premium inventory. We are working closely with data vendors, ad exchanges, and sales management system vendors to expand the range and value of the analytics we provide, and make the data more actionable for publishers.

Follow Tom Shields (@tshields), Yieldex (@yieldex) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger.com) on Twitter.

Must Read

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

Retail Media Is Starting To Come To Grips With The Fact That We All Know Nothing

Retail media is entering what might be called its Socratic phase. The closer we to get to understanding an ad campaign’s real impact and business results, the clearer it is that we have no idea how this thing works.

Meta Reels trending ads

Meta Has New Tools For Brand And Performance Goals, With A Focus On AI (Of Course)

Meta is rolling out Reels trending ads, value rules beyond just conversions, upgrades to Threads and pixel-free landing page optimization.

Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Google Search Ads 360 Adds Criteo As First On-Site Retail Media Supply Partner

Criteo announced a partnership with Google Search Ads 360 (SA360), Google’s enterprise search advertising platform, making Criteo the first third-party vendor to integrate with Google for on-site retail media supply.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Minute Media’s Latest Acquisition Brings Automated Content Creation To Its Online Sports Video Network

As display falters, Minute Media is acquiring AI tech that cuts longer-form video content and full-length games into bite-size clips.

With GAM Going Direct To Buyers, SPO Is The New Normal

GAM’s dinner with ad agencies sparked speculation that Google is preparing to spin off its bundled SSP and ad server as a remedy to its ad tech monopoly. But Google says it’s just part of the trend of SSPs going direct to buyers.

Google’s Proposed Fix To Its Ad Tech Monopoly Is At Odds With The DOJ’s Remedies

Late Friday evening, Google filed its proposed remedies to its ad tech monopoly to District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema, and unsurprisingly, they’re rather mild – and very different from what the Department of Justice is looking for.