Home Yield Management Tools Yieldex Q&A With Tom Shields: Optimizing For Publishers with Direct Sales Teams

Yieldex Q&A With Tom Shields: Optimizing For Publishers with Direct Sales Teams

SHARE:

Yieldex Yield Optimization ProfileTom Shields is Chief Executive Officer of yield optimization company, Yieldex.

AdExchanger.com: How many participating publishers?

TS: We have announced Martha Stewart Omnimedia as our first publisher partner. We are currently engaged with a number of other large publishers that we are not publicizing yet.

What is your target publisher market? Can any publisher participate?

Our target market is publishers who have a direct sales force and who want to maximize their revenue on premium inventory. While any publisher could participate, we are ideally suited for larger publishers who have their own sales team.

Do you consider your company’s model full-service or self-service?

We provide tools and technology solutions for publishers to gain a deeper understanding of their premium inventory, and provide recommendations to help them optimize their yield. These tools are used by each publisher’s in-house sales and operations teams. We manage the integration of the Yieldex solution, and provide services to our publishers to ensure they are taking full advantage of our tools to maximize their revenue.

What are the advantages of a yield optimization company?

The manual spreadsheets that most operations teams are using now are insufficient to give sales the answers they need to sell efficiently. Using a next generation tool like Yieldex BusinessIQ will help everyone in the organization make better decisions, drive operational efficiency, and optimize revenue.

What are the advantages of your company’s offerings among all the yield optimization companies?

We are the only one focused on the premium inventory that is sold by a direct sales force. For most large publishers, over 70% of their revenue comes from less than 10% of their inventory, and the average CPMs of inventory they sell are $10-20 vs $1 or less for ad networks. We enable publishers to manage, predict and optimize this premium inventory. (See slide 6 of the IAB/Bain study.)

Explain your company’s revenue model.

We are software-as-a-service with a monthly flat fee based on volume.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Can advertisers or ad networks buy through your company?

No. We do not sell inventory on behalf of our clients.

If not, will either of these two be able to purchase through your company someday?

We have no plans to sell inventory at this time.

What kinds of inventory are you “optimizing”? Static display, text? Rich media? Video?

We optimize premium inventory, which is typically sold directly by publishers on a CPM or CPD basis, at a high CPM. We support any and all creative formats deployed online today.

How do you see advertising exchanges impacting your business now and in the future?

Advertising exchanges are great for our industry, because they give publishers the ability to understand the baseline value of their inventory in an open market. Larger publishers will continue to sell premium inventory directly, because many ad campaigns will require characteristics that advertising exchanges have difficulty providing (impression guarantees, exclusivity, online/offline packages, etc), but this data will allow BusinessIQ to help them to make better decisions about packaging and selling their premium inventory.

Can your yield optimization service be integrated with other ad management platforms?

Yes, we are currently integrated with several ad serving platforms and several order management systems, and are integrating with more of these based on client demand.

Where do you see your company’s product line evolving in the next 18-24 months?

We will continue to provide solutions based on our DynamicIQ platform to help maximize premium inventory. We are working closely with data vendors, ad exchanges, and sales management system vendors to expand the range and value of the analytics we provide, and make the data more actionable for publishers.

Follow Tom Shields (@tshields), Yieldex (@yieldex) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger.com) on Twitter.

Must Read

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.