Home AdExchanger Talks Podcast: Forrester’s Quality Equation

Podcast: Forrester’s Quality Equation

SHARE:

Welcome to episode No. 16 of AdExchanger Talks, a podcast focused on data-driven marketing. Subscribe here.

The mainstreaming of programmatic has forced marketers to get serious about quality – both the quality of overall customer experience and individual ad impressions.

In a recent report, Forrester Research said this issue could lead marketers to scale back on programmatic in the short term and accept higher prices for verified inventory.

“We’re not saying pull out of programmatic. That’s absurd,” Melissa Parrish, Forrester VP and Research Director, explains in the latest episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“We’re saying, take advantage of the controls you have. Once you do that, we’re talking about an environment where the inventory becomes more premium, more selective, better targeted.”

To get there, marketers need to keep a close eye on their partners: agencies, publishers and tech vendors. They need to leverage existing quality-control technologies, such as blacklists, whitelists and verification tools. And they need to align internal and external incentives.

Sounds like a tall order, but it’s all doable using resources available today.

“I don’t think it’s that huge of a leap from a technology perspective,” Parrish says. “I don’t think it’s that huge of a leap from an agency relationship perspective. The biggest leap is the marketer taking control in ways they haven’t previously felt comfortable doing. … It’s not a five-year plan because we’re waiting for the technology to meet our needs. It’s a strategic, cultural change.”

The appropriate degree of control is up to each marketer. Bringing programmatic entirely in-house, as Netflix and a smattering of others have done, is impractical for most brands.

“They know these are not things they can do on their own. The size of the team it would require is a non-starter, so it’s not necessarily that they want to bring that in-house. It’s that they want to have a stronger hand in what happens.”

Also in this episode: Inching toward social attribution, AI hype in marketing and brand-as-utility.

acxiom_adexchanger_talks_banner_300x250  AdExchanger Talks is supported by Acxiom.

Must Read

Don’t Worry About Netflix – It’s Doing Fine Without Warner Bros. Discovery

Paramount might have outlasted and outbid Netflix in the competition to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, but Netflix is not overly fussed about the loss.

Paramount’s Upfront Pitch Is About Three Things

Paramount is merging the ad tech stacks behind Paramount+ and Pluto TV, releasing a new performance product, offering more control over ad placements and introducing dynamic ad insertion in live sports.

Hard Truths For Retail Media At The IAB Connected Commerce Summit

The IAB’s Connected Commerce event in New York City this week felt to me like the retail media industry’s first sit-down explanation to a child who is now a “big kid” and must act accordingly.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Meta Is Launching An Easy Button For CAPI

Meta is simplifying its CAPI setup and teaching its pixel new tricks, including adding an AI-powered feature that automatically pulls in data from an advertiser’s website.

TelevisaUnivision Joins The Streaming Self-Service Bandwagon

TelevisaUnivision is the latest TV publisher to join the self-serve trend that’s rising in popularity across connected TV advertising. Its streaming inventory is now available to buy through fullthrottle.ai’s self-serve platform. The collaboration includes an ad bidder designed to improve both targeting and measurement.

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

For Google Advertisers Who Overpaid The Monopoly – Don’t Hate, Arbitrate

Law firm Keller Postman is leading mass arbitration suits against Google, seeking advertiser damages for alleged monopoly overpricing. The total available pot is a quarter-trillion dollars.