Home Digital TV and Video Video Ad IPO Redux! Contrasting YuMe With Tremor Media

Video Ad IPO Redux! Contrasting YuMe With Tremor Media

SHARE:

Jayant Kadambi, CEO, YuMeVideo-ad tech firm YuMe has filed its S-1 with the SEC in hopes of raising $65 million in the public markets. The filing, expected by industry observers since the start of the year, comes less than a week after rival video-ad company Tremor filed its IPO. Among other video-ad firms in the wings for a public offering are Adap.tv and BrightRoll.

YuMe and Tremor have some things in common. Both are somewhat long-in-the-tooth video platforms, with their roots in the publisher network model.

Of the two, YuMe has a brighter story to tell. According to its filing, the company posted net income of $6.3 million between March 2012 and March 2013, reversing a loss of $11.1 million in 2011. In addition, revenues for the year ending in March 2013 were up 70%, to $116.7 million.

Tremor, by contrast, is far from profitability. In 2012 Tremor’s total revenue rose a mere 16%, from $90.3 million to $105.2 million year-over-year, while its net loss decreased only slightly, from $21.0 million to $16.6 million.

Tremor priced its IPO at $10 and has consistently traded down every day since, due in part to underwhelming revenue figures shown in its preliminary filing with the SEC.

YuMe employs a total sales and marketing staff of 155, with 120 based in the US.  In contrast, Tremor has been hiring more aggressively; the company has said it has about 249 staffers, up from 185 employees at Jan. 1, 2011.

Last year YuMe delivered over 8 billion video-ad impressions across all screens, including gaming consoles and connected sets, two areas the company has been concentrating on for years. It claimed to have reached 257 million monthly unique viewers worldwide during May 2013. Tremor doesn’t list its reach of uniques, but does note its data is based on more than 20 billion in-stream video-ad impressions delivered through the 500-plus sites in the Tremor Video Network.

Unlike Tremor, Redwood City, Calif.-based YuMe has avoided positioning as a “programmatic” player in the video-ad space. The concern has been that too many marketers and publishers/broadcasters view programmatic as catering to bottom-of-the-funnel, direct-response advertising as opposed to the more lucrative brand campaigns that are closely associated with prime-time TV.

“We do have a small amount of ad sales coming to us through programmatic channels,” Ed Haslam, YuMe’s SVP of marketing, told AdExchanger last month. “Buyers have been conditioned to buy premium through a rep, like they do with TV, and to get direct-response inventory through platforms and programmatic. A buyer doesn’t know what you are when you do both.”

That said, YuMe does not want to be perceived as a Luddite and has spent heavily to refresh its capabilities. Earlier this year it bought Crowd Science, which came with its own sell-side platform, Citrus. And two years ago it acquired mobile-focused video-ad company Appealing Media. The primary reason for that deal, YuMe’s first acquisition, was the easy entry to the European market that the London-based Appealing Media would provide.

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.